Case Author(s): Delphine Chen, M.D. and Robert Gropler, M.D. , 5/10/06 . Rating: #D3, #Q4

Diagnosis: Adenosine-induced complete heart block

Brief history:

68 yo. man with Shy-Drager's syndrome who is being evaluated pre-operatively for bladder surgery. Cardiac risk factors are high cholesterol and diabetes. Evaluate for ischemia.

Images:

Splash images of myocardial perfusion study.

View main image(mi) in a separate image viewer

View second image(mc). Baseline ECG

View third image(mc). ECG at 00:57 minutes after start of adenosine infusion

View fourth image(mc). ECG at 1:07 minutes after start of adenosine infusion

Full history/Diagnosis is available below


Diagnosis: Adenosine-induced complete heart block

Full history:

68 yo. man with Shy-Drager's syndrome who is being evaluated pre-operatively for bladder surgery. Cardiac risk factors include high cholesterol and diabetes. Evaluate for ischemia.

Radiopharmaceutical:

2.5 mCi Tl-201 chloride and 20.3 mCi Tc-99m sestamibi

Findings:

There was normal perfusion on both rest and pharmacologic-stress images. Gated SPECT images (not shown) demonstrated normal systolic function.

The patient was originally scheduled as an adenosine stress test with myocardial perfusion imaging. The adenosine test was aborted due to the development of complete heart block (see 3rd ECG above), at which time the infusion was stopped. A dobutamine stress test was subsequently performed, during which the patient achieved 91% of predicted maximum heart rate without symptoms and no evidence of ischemia on the dobutamine stress ECG.

Discussion:

This study was originally scheduled as an adenosine stress test with myocardial perfusion imaging. The patient's baseline ECG demonstrates an elongated P-R interval, indicating the presence of 1st degree A-V block.

During the adenosine stress test, the patient developed complete heart block and became unresponsive. The adenosine infusion was immediately discontinued with full recovery of the patient within minutes. No further interventions required. The patient then underwent a dobutamine stress test without further incident.

This study illustrates the importance of monitoring patients during cardiac stress testing. Adenosine causes slowing of conduction across the atrioventricular node; therefore, patients with first-degree AV block must be closely monitored for the development of complete heart block. This complication is easily reversed by immediately stopping the adenosine infusion. If the heart block persists, aminophylline or atropine can be administered to reverse the effects of the adenosine.

In choosing which type of pharmacologic stress test to order, it is important to consider the patient's clinical status. The presence of a 1st degree heart block is not an absolute contraindication to adenosine stress test; however, since adenosine slows conduction at the AV node and hence is the only agent that can induce heart block, these patients require especially close monitoring during an adenosine stress test. Dipyridamole, which blocks re-uptake of adenosine that leads to elevated adenosine levels, rarely causes heart block because the adenosine levels achieved are not as high as that seen with infusion of adenosine. Dobutamine is a synthetic catecholamine with inotropic and chronotropic effects, leading to increased sinoatrial and atrioventricular node conduction and ectopy; the risk of developing arrhythmias is higher with dobutamine than with the vasodilating agents.1

1. Leppo JA. Comparison of pharmacologic stress agents. J Nucl Cardiol 1996;3:S22-26.

Followup:

The patient had an adequate response to dobutamine, achieving 91%, well over the required 85% maximum heart rate for a maximal stress test. He was discharged home after the test without further complication.

ACR Codes and Keywords:

References and General Discussion of Myocardial Imaging (Anatomic field:Heart and Great Vessels, Category:Other generalized systemic disorder)

Search for similar cases.

Edit this case

Add comments about this case

Return to the Teaching File home page.


Case number: mi032

Copyright by Wash U MO